![]() It would put more women's health at risk and cause overcrowding and delays at clinics that provide surgical abortion, they wrote in their response.Ī decision by the court to overturn the FDA's approval could also harm future drug development, the government's lawyers said. The public interest would be "dramatically harmed" by pulling mifepristone from the market, the government lawyers argued. Decades of experience from thousands of women and their physicians has confirmed mifepristone is safer than surgical abortion or childbirth, they said. The FDA determined that mifepristone is a safe and effective way to end an early pregnancy more than two decades ago based on extensive scientific evidence, the agency's lawyers wrote. The FDA, in its response filed earlier this month, described the lawsuit as "extraordinary and unprecedented." The government's lawyers said they could not find any previous example of a court second-guessing an FDA approval and removing a widely available drug from the market. They contend pregnancy is not an illness, mifepristone is not more safe and effective than surgical abortion, and claim the FDA's actions have put patients' health at risk. In their complaint, the anti-abortion physicians argue the FDA abused its power by approving mifepristone through an accelerated process which is reserved for new drugs that would benefit patients with serious or life-threatening illnesses more than what's currently available. From there, the case could end up at the Supreme Court. If the alliance wins in federal district court, the Biden administration would appeal to the 5th Circuit in New Orleans, a conservative court with 12 of its 16 active judges appointed by Republicans. District Court for the Northern District of Texas in 2019. Kacsmaryk was appointed by former President Donald Trump to the U.S. Judge Matthew Kacsmaryk is hearing the challenge to the FDA's approval of the abortion pill. Jackson Women's Health Organization case that ultimately resulted in the Supreme Court abolishing federal abortion rights. The Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine is represented by the Alliance Defending Freedom, a Christian organization that played a central role in the Dobbs vs. The court could issue a ruling as soon as Feb. The FDA's powers to approve drugs would also be weakened. would lose access, at least temporarily, to the most commonly used abortion method. If the lawsuit prevails, women across the U.S. The case has thrust the FDA in the middle of the fierce national battle over abortion access in the wake of the Supreme Court's decision to overturn Roe v. Personal Loans for 670 Credit Score or Lower Personal Loans for 580 Credit Score or Lower Each person must play his or her particular role, under one shared vision, to ensure that religious freedom thrives.Best Debt Consolidation Loans for Bad Credit And business professionals play a different role than grassroots advocates. ![]() Non-profit volunteers play different roles than legislators. Attorneys play different roles than church and ministry leaders. Like the Body of Christ, the alliance is one body made up of many parts. When 35 Christian leaders came together to build a ministry that would defend religious liberty and keep the doors open for the Gospel, they knew it would take an alliance. ADF has won 13 victories at the Supreme Court since 2011, and we’re winning nearly 80 percent of all our cases-but we don’t do it alone. We defend your most cherished liberties in Congress, state legislatures, and courtrooms across the country-all the way to the U.S. Alliance Defending Freedom is the world’s largest legal organization committed to protecting religious freedom, free speech, marriage and family, parental rights, and the sanctity of life.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |