It’s also worth noting that the camera was essentially silent in the walkthrough test. The Hyperfire 2 also performed well in the field, capturing a series of buck photos as he slunk through tall green grass on a property in Wisconsin. Right: The camera stopped motion at 10 feet. Left, the Reconyx captured the author at 60 feet. That won’t be as much of problem with the Reconyx. Often a buck that runs right by the camera is captured in a photo as a white blur, making it impossible to count points. If you’ve reviewed nighttime photos during the rut, you know this is important. Importantly, it was the only camera that truly stopped motion at close range at night (you can see that image below). This camera performed well in the walk through test, triggering out to 60 feet day and night and also catching me at close range. Hardcore hunters who want that same type of performance should consider the Hyperfire 2. There’s a reason why most professional wildlife researchers who use trail cameras rely on Reconyx: Their cameras reliably deliver high quality images and run without fail. The Reconyx cam captured this buck sneaking through tall grass. Records video, but doesn’t transmit through cellular.The Test Team and LocationsĪlex Robinson, editor-in-chief, Minnesota and Wisconsin Best Cellular Trail Cameras: Reviews & Recommendations Best Overall: Reconyx Hyperfire 2 Celluar This included the ability to use each camera’s app to review and sort photos. In the field, we evaluated the camera’s photo quality, reliability, and ease of setup. We set cameras in areas that had reasonable cell service. We looked for blank photos, failures to trigger, blurry images, and overall photo quality.įrom there, we set each camera in the field to see how it performed in real world conditions. The test is meant to measure the camera’s detection range, trigger speed, shutter speed, and flash range. The walkthrough test was then repeated at night. Then the tester walked past the camera (left to right and then right to left) at a medium pace at each given distance. Markers were placed at 10 feet, 60 feet, and 110 feet. Scott EinsmannĮach cellular trail camera was set to its fastest shooting mode and highest sensitivity. How We Tested the Best Cellular Trail Cams Our setup for testing trail cameras. Plans for each company are structured differently, but there are usually monthly or annual options ranging from about $5 per month to more than $20 per month. When set in an area with cell service, the camera will send photos (or videos) to the app. Then you set up a plan, load the camera with batteries, a sim card, and an SD card, pair the camera with the app (by scanning a QR code with your phone) and then establish your camera settings. First you download an app from the company. Our results will help you pick the best cellular trail cameras for your hunting style and area.Īll the cell cams in this test have a similar basic setup process. We ran them in the field and conducted a standardized backyard walkthrough test. With that in mind three diehard deer hunters spent the last year testing the top cellular trail cams. So why would you make your trail camera strategy more complicated by throwing in cellular cameras, which require network connection and pairing with apps? Simple, it’s because once you finally have the best cellular trail cameras linked up and set properly, they provide you with constant, realtime scouting information that will help you pattern deer. Batteries die, SD cards get corrupted, settings get messed up, and squirrels trigger thousands of useless images. Let’s get this part out of the way first: Trail cameras are a pain in the ass.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |